![\"martin-franck-cartier-bresson\"](\"http:\/\/antoine.wojdyla.fr\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/martin-franck-cartier-bresson.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nMartine’s legs – Henri Cartier-Bresson (1967)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Ringolevio<\/a> (Emmett Grogan)<\/h3>Ringolevio is a sort of autobiography by Emmett Grogan, a leader of the Diggers in San Francisco just about when it was becoming cool (early 60s). It is a great book in that it is written with a punch, and has a deep sense of social awareness. It is quite fun to read Timothy Leary and other fake-prophets of the revolution getting thrashed.<\/p>\n
Emmett wondered whether anything viable was going to come out of it: whether the powerless might for once obtain enough power to make some sort of relevant change in the society. He immediately dismissed as ridiculous the notion that everything would be all right when everyone turned on acid. It was noted that LSD was used during World War Two to solve naval tactical maneuvers, and they concluded that although the drug might facilitate understanding or the process of doing something, it offered no moral direction or imperatives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
There is no road<\/a> (Antonio Machado)<\/h3>This is my absolute favorite poem books. It is very short, and has the deepest thoughts ever assembled in a book. This book is a treasure, and I have offered it to people I care about. This book is often out of print, but don’t settle for a different collection, this one is really unique if you can find it, and by far the best translations I’ve found.<\/p>\n
Between living and dreaming there is a third thing. Guess what it is
\n– Antonio Machado<\/p><\/blockquote>
<\/p>\n
The Art of Being Right<\/a> (Arthur Schopenhauer)<\/h3>This is a classic from the funniest and most profound German philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer. It is worth reading, especially in these times where the veracity of information is no longer decisive in getting a message across. Here’s a summary<\/a>, and an excerpt:<\/p>\nClaim Victory Despite Defeat.<\/strong><\/p>This, which is an impudent trick, is played as follows: When your opponent has answered several of your questions without the answers turning out favourable to the conclusion at which you are aiming, advance the desired conclusion, \u2014 although it does not in the least follow, \u2014 as though it had been proved, and proclaim it in a tone of triumph. If your opponent is shy or stupid, and you yourself possess a great deal of impudence and a good voice, the trick may easily succeed. It is akin to the fallacy non causae ut causae.<\/p><\/blockquote>(There’s an updated version of these techiques by Tenaillon<\/a>, in French)<\/p>\nThe Edge<\/a> annual questions<\/h3>I found these books ideal to keep up with the latest news in all fields of science and arts.<\/p>From Hans Ulrich Obrist’s 2013 entry “The Relative Obscurity Of The Writings Of \u00c9douard Glissant<\/a>“<\/span><\/p>\nGerhard Richter says that art is the highest form of hope. I would add that art is the primary form of resistance to homogenisation and extinction. To quote Zweig again: ‘art still exists to give shape to multiple ways of being’.<\/p><\/blockquote>
You can find all the questions and responses here<\/a>, and every year a book is edited. This a great thing to read when you’re traveling, because each response is a few pages long, ideal when you cannot focus too much<\/p>2017 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC TERM OR CONCEPT OUGHT TO BE MORE WIDELY KNOWN?
\n2016 : WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THE MOST INTERESTING RECENT [SCIENTIFIC] NEWS?
\n2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
\n2014 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC IDEA IS READY FOR RETIREMENT?
\n2013 : WHAT *SHOULD* WE BE WORRIED ABOUT?
\n2012 : WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE DEEP, ELEGANT, OR BEAUTIFUL EXPLANATION?
\n2011 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY’S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT?
\n2010 : HOW IS THE INTERNET CHANGING THE WAY YOU THINK?
\n2009 : WHAT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING?
\n2008 : WHAT HAVE YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT? WHY?
\n2007 : WHAT ARE YOU OPTIMISTIC ABOUT?
\n2006 : WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA?
\n2005 : WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE EVEN THOUGH YOU CANNOT PROVE IT?<\/p>\nGodel Escher Bach (Douglas Hoffstadter)<\/h3>
Helps you understand what is logic. This is not an easy text, since it requires more than basic notions of mathematics, but it blends together music, painting and logic.<\/p>\n
The Dubliners<\/a> (James Joyce)<\/h3>This a classic, from probably to most interesting English author of the 20th century.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the song? Why does that make you cry?\u201d
\nShe raised her head from her arms and dried her eyes with the back of her hand like a child. A kinder note than he had intended went into his voice.
\n\u201cWhy, Gretta?\u201d he asked.
\n\u201cI am thinking about a person long ago who used to sing that song.\u201d
\n\u201cAnd who was the person long ago?\u201d asked Gabriel, smiling.
\n\u201cIt was a person I used to know in Galway when I was living with my grandmother,\u201d she said.
\nThe smile passed away from Gabriel\u2019s face. A dull anger began to gather again at the back of his mind and the dull fires of his lust began to glow angrily in his veins.
\n\u201cSomeone you were in love with?\u201d he asked ironically.
\n\u201cIt was a young boy I used to know,\u201d she answered, \u201cnamed Michael Furey. He used to sing that song, The Lass of Aughrim<\/i>. He was very delicate.\u201d
\nGabriel was silent. He did not wish her to think that he was interested in this delicate boy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nThe consolation of Philosophy<\/a> (Boetius)<\/h3>Boetius, who used to be rich and famous, is sent to jail. There, he can only speak to Philosophy, who in a gracious hands give him consolation against the ills of life. Why action is desirable, and why life is about unexpectations.<\/p>O Fortuna!<\/p>\n
The Black Swan<\/a> (Nicholas Nassim Taleb)<\/h3>Deep thoughts about the role of chance. It is really inspiring in that you realize that no one in the world has a clue of what’s happening, or can possibly have.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nWe like stories, we like to summarize, and we like to simplify, i.e., to re\u00ad duce the dimension of matters. The first of the problems of human nature that we examine in this section, the one just illustrated above, is what I call the narrative fallacy. (It is actually a fraud, but, to be more polite, I will call it a fallacy.) The fallacy is associated with our vulnerability to over-interpretation and our predilection for compact stories over raw truths. It severely distorts our mental representation of the world; it is particularly acute when it comes to the rare event.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Thinking Fast and Slow<\/a> (Daniel Kahneman)<\/h3>Few cool thoughts.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nOdean began by studying the trading records of 10,000 brokerage accounts of individual investors spanning a seven-year period. He was able to analyze every transaction the investors executed through that firm, nearly 163,000 trades. This rich set of data allowed Odean to identify all instances in which an investor sold some of his holdings in one stock and soon afterward bought another stock. By these actions the investor revealed that he (most of the investors were men) had a definite idea about the future of the two stocks: he expected the stock that he chose to buy to do better than the stock he chose to sell.<\/p>To determine whether those ideas were well founded, Odean compared the returns of the stock the investor had sold and the stock he had bought in its place, over the course of one year after the transaction. The results were unequivocally bad. On average, the shares that individual traders sold did better than those they bought, by a very substantial margin: 3.2 percentage points per year, above and beyond the significant costs of executing the two trades.<\/p>It is important to remember that this is a statement about averages: some individuals did much better, others did much worse. However, it is clear that for the large majority of individual investors, taking a shower and doing nothing would have been a better policy than implementing the ideas that came to their minds<\/strong>. Later research by Odean and his colleague Brad Barber supported this conclusion. In a paper titled \u2015Trading Is Hazardous to Your health, they showed that, on average, the most active traders had the poorest results, while the investors who traded the least earned the highest returns. In another paper, titled \u2015Boys Will Be Boys,\u2016 they showed that men acted on their useless ideas significantly more often than women, and that as a result women achieved better investment results than men.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Selfish gene (Richard Dawkins)<\/h3>
In a world of so-called “free-market”, there is ample use of the notion of the “survival of the fittest”, which is often misunderstood for what it’s not — the dominance of the strongest.<\/p>(I particularly loved the chapter on dynamic game theory)<\/p>\n
Walden (Henry David Thoreau)<\/h3>
A must-read to understand the poetry and despair of the American life.<\/p>\n
Children, who play life, discern its true law and relations more clearly than men, who fail to live it worthily, but who think that they are wiser by experience, that is, by failure.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Steppenwolf (Herman Hesse)<\/h3>
My favorite book from early adulthood.<\/p>There are also many other books to read — Bertrand Russell “Religion and Science<\/a>“, Nietzsche’s “Birth of Tragedy<\/a>“, Stefan Zweig’s “The World of Yesterday<\/a>“, Albert Camus “The Myth of Sisyphus<\/a>“, Romain Gary “Promise at dawn” and many others…<\/p>\n
Emmett wondered whether anything viable was going to come out of it: whether the powerless might for once obtain enough power to make some sort of relevant change in the society. He immediately dismissed as ridiculous the notion that everything would be all right when everyone turned on acid. It was noted that LSD was used during World War Two to solve naval tactical maneuvers, and they concluded that although the drug might facilitate understanding or the process of doing something, it offered no moral direction or imperatives.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
There is no road<\/a> (Antonio Machado)<\/h3>This is my absolute favorite poem books. It is very short, and has the deepest thoughts ever assembled in a book. This book is a treasure, and I have offered it to people I care about. This book is often out of print, but don’t settle for a different collection, this one is really unique if you can find it, and by far the best translations I’ve found.<\/p>\n
Between living and dreaming there is a third thing. Guess what it is
\n– Antonio Machado<\/p><\/blockquote>
<\/p>\n
The Art of Being Right<\/a> (Arthur Schopenhauer)<\/h3>This is a classic from the funniest and most profound German philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer. It is worth reading, especially in these times where the veracity of information is no longer decisive in getting a message across. Here’s a summary<\/a>, and an excerpt:<\/p>\nClaim Victory Despite Defeat.<\/strong><\/p>This, which is an impudent trick, is played as follows: When your opponent has answered several of your questions without the answers turning out favourable to the conclusion at which you are aiming, advance the desired conclusion, \u2014 although it does not in the least follow, \u2014 as though it had been proved, and proclaim it in a tone of triumph. If your opponent is shy or stupid, and you yourself possess a great deal of impudence and a good voice, the trick may easily succeed. It is akin to the fallacy non causae ut causae.<\/p><\/blockquote>(There’s an updated version of these techiques by Tenaillon<\/a>, in French)<\/p>\nThe Edge<\/a> annual questions<\/h3>I found these books ideal to keep up with the latest news in all fields of science and arts.<\/p>From Hans Ulrich Obrist’s 2013 entry “The Relative Obscurity Of The Writings Of \u00c9douard Glissant<\/a>“<\/span><\/p>\nGerhard Richter says that art is the highest form of hope. I would add that art is the primary form of resistance to homogenisation and extinction. To quote Zweig again: ‘art still exists to give shape to multiple ways of being’.<\/p><\/blockquote>
You can find all the questions and responses here<\/a>, and every year a book is edited. This a great thing to read when you’re traveling, because each response is a few pages long, ideal when you cannot focus too much<\/p>2017 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC TERM OR CONCEPT OUGHT TO BE MORE WIDELY KNOWN?
\n2016 : WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THE MOST INTERESTING RECENT [SCIENTIFIC] NEWS?
\n2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
\n2014 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC IDEA IS READY FOR RETIREMENT?
\n2013 : WHAT *SHOULD* WE BE WORRIED ABOUT?
\n2012 : WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE DEEP, ELEGANT, OR BEAUTIFUL EXPLANATION?
\n2011 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY’S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT?
\n2010 : HOW IS THE INTERNET CHANGING THE WAY YOU THINK?
\n2009 : WHAT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING?
\n2008 : WHAT HAVE YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT? WHY?
\n2007 : WHAT ARE YOU OPTIMISTIC ABOUT?
\n2006 : WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA?
\n2005 : WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE EVEN THOUGH YOU CANNOT PROVE IT?<\/p>\nGodel Escher Bach (Douglas Hoffstadter)<\/h3>
Helps you understand what is logic. This is not an easy text, since it requires more than basic notions of mathematics, but it blends together music, painting and logic.<\/p>\n
The Dubliners<\/a> (James Joyce)<\/h3>This a classic, from probably to most interesting English author of the 20th century.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the song? Why does that make you cry?\u201d
\nShe raised her head from her arms and dried her eyes with the back of her hand like a child. A kinder note than he had intended went into his voice.
\n\u201cWhy, Gretta?\u201d he asked.
\n\u201cI am thinking about a person long ago who used to sing that song.\u201d
\n\u201cAnd who was the person long ago?\u201d asked Gabriel, smiling.
\n\u201cIt was a person I used to know in Galway when I was living with my grandmother,\u201d she said.
\nThe smile passed away from Gabriel\u2019s face. A dull anger began to gather again at the back of his mind and the dull fires of his lust began to glow angrily in his veins.
\n\u201cSomeone you were in love with?\u201d he asked ironically.
\n\u201cIt was a young boy I used to know,\u201d she answered, \u201cnamed Michael Furey. He used to sing that song, The Lass of Aughrim<\/i>. He was very delicate.\u201d
\nGabriel was silent. He did not wish her to think that he was interested in this delicate boy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nThe consolation of Philosophy<\/a> (Boetius)<\/h3>Boetius, who used to be rich and famous, is sent to jail. There, he can only speak to Philosophy, who in a gracious hands give him consolation against the ills of life. Why action is desirable, and why life is about unexpectations.<\/p>O Fortuna!<\/p>\n
The Black Swan<\/a> (Nicholas Nassim Taleb)<\/h3>Deep thoughts about the role of chance. It is really inspiring in that you realize that no one in the world has a clue of what’s happening, or can possibly have.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nWe like stories, we like to summarize, and we like to simplify, i.e., to re\u00ad duce the dimension of matters. The first of the problems of human nature that we examine in this section, the one just illustrated above, is what I call the narrative fallacy. (It is actually a fraud, but, to be more polite, I will call it a fallacy.) The fallacy is associated with our vulnerability to over-interpretation and our predilection for compact stories over raw truths. It severely distorts our mental representation of the world; it is particularly acute when it comes to the rare event.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Thinking Fast and Slow<\/a> (Daniel Kahneman)<\/h3>Few cool thoughts.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nOdean began by studying the trading records of 10,000 brokerage accounts of individual investors spanning a seven-year period. He was able to analyze every transaction the investors executed through that firm, nearly 163,000 trades. This rich set of data allowed Odean to identify all instances in which an investor sold some of his holdings in one stock and soon afterward bought another stock. By these actions the investor revealed that he (most of the investors were men) had a definite idea about the future of the two stocks: he expected the stock that he chose to buy to do better than the stock he chose to sell.<\/p>To determine whether those ideas were well founded, Odean compared the returns of the stock the investor had sold and the stock he had bought in its place, over the course of one year after the transaction. The results were unequivocally bad. On average, the shares that individual traders sold did better than those they bought, by a very substantial margin: 3.2 percentage points per year, above and beyond the significant costs of executing the two trades.<\/p>It is important to remember that this is a statement about averages: some individuals did much better, others did much worse. However, it is clear that for the large majority of individual investors, taking a shower and doing nothing would have been a better policy than implementing the ideas that came to their minds<\/strong>. Later research by Odean and his colleague Brad Barber supported this conclusion. In a paper titled \u2015Trading Is Hazardous to Your health, they showed that, on average, the most active traders had the poorest results, while the investors who traded the least earned the highest returns. In another paper, titled \u2015Boys Will Be Boys,\u2016 they showed that men acted on their useless ideas significantly more often than women, and that as a result women achieved better investment results than men.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Selfish gene (Richard Dawkins)<\/h3>
In a world of so-called “free-market”, there is ample use of the notion of the “survival of the fittest”, which is often misunderstood for what it’s not — the dominance of the strongest.<\/p>(I particularly loved the chapter on dynamic game theory)<\/p>\n
Walden (Henry David Thoreau)<\/h3>
A must-read to understand the poetry and despair of the American life.<\/p>\n
Children, who play life, discern its true law and relations more clearly than men, who fail to live it worthily, but who think that they are wiser by experience, that is, by failure.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Steppenwolf (Herman Hesse)<\/h3>
My favorite book from early adulthood.<\/p>There are also many other books to read — Bertrand Russell “Religion and Science<\/a>“, Nietzsche’s “Birth of Tragedy<\/a>“, Stefan Zweig’s “The World of Yesterday<\/a>“, Albert Camus “The Myth of Sisyphus<\/a>“, Romain Gary “Promise at dawn” and many others…<\/p>\n
Between living and dreaming there is a third thing. Guess what it is
\n– Antonio Machado<\/p><\/blockquote>
<\/p>\n
The Art of Being Right<\/a> (Arthur Schopenhauer)<\/h3>This is a classic from the funniest and most profound German philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer. It is worth reading, especially in these times where the veracity of information is no longer decisive in getting a message across. Here’s a summary<\/a>, and an excerpt:<\/p>\nClaim Victory Despite Defeat.<\/strong><\/p>This, which is an impudent trick, is played as follows: When your opponent has answered several of your questions without the answers turning out favourable to the conclusion at which you are aiming, advance the desired conclusion, \u2014 although it does not in the least follow, \u2014 as though it had been proved, and proclaim it in a tone of triumph. If your opponent is shy or stupid, and you yourself possess a great deal of impudence and a good voice, the trick may easily succeed. It is akin to the fallacy non causae ut causae.<\/p><\/blockquote>(There’s an updated version of these techiques by Tenaillon<\/a>, in French)<\/p>\nThe Edge<\/a> annual questions<\/h3>I found these books ideal to keep up with the latest news in all fields of science and arts.<\/p>From Hans Ulrich Obrist’s 2013 entry “The Relative Obscurity Of The Writings Of \u00c9douard Glissant<\/a>“<\/span><\/p>\nGerhard Richter says that art is the highest form of hope. I would add that art is the primary form of resistance to homogenisation and extinction. To quote Zweig again: ‘art still exists to give shape to multiple ways of being’.<\/p><\/blockquote>
You can find all the questions and responses here<\/a>, and every year a book is edited. This a great thing to read when you’re traveling, because each response is a few pages long, ideal when you cannot focus too much<\/p>2017 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC TERM OR CONCEPT OUGHT TO BE MORE WIDELY KNOWN?
\n2016 : WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THE MOST INTERESTING RECENT [SCIENTIFIC] NEWS?
\n2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
\n2014 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC IDEA IS READY FOR RETIREMENT?
\n2013 : WHAT *SHOULD* WE BE WORRIED ABOUT?
\n2012 : WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE DEEP, ELEGANT, OR BEAUTIFUL EXPLANATION?
\n2011 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY’S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT?
\n2010 : HOW IS THE INTERNET CHANGING THE WAY YOU THINK?
\n2009 : WHAT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING?
\n2008 : WHAT HAVE YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT? WHY?
\n2007 : WHAT ARE YOU OPTIMISTIC ABOUT?
\n2006 : WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA?
\n2005 : WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE EVEN THOUGH YOU CANNOT PROVE IT?<\/p>\nGodel Escher Bach (Douglas Hoffstadter)<\/h3>
Helps you understand what is logic. This is not an easy text, since it requires more than basic notions of mathematics, but it blends together music, painting and logic.<\/p>\n
The Dubliners<\/a> (James Joyce)<\/h3>This a classic, from probably to most interesting English author of the 20th century.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the song? Why does that make you cry?\u201d
\nShe raised her head from her arms and dried her eyes with the back of her hand like a child. A kinder note than he had intended went into his voice.
\n\u201cWhy, Gretta?\u201d he asked.
\n\u201cI am thinking about a person long ago who used to sing that song.\u201d
\n\u201cAnd who was the person long ago?\u201d asked Gabriel, smiling.
\n\u201cIt was a person I used to know in Galway when I was living with my grandmother,\u201d she said.
\nThe smile passed away from Gabriel\u2019s face. A dull anger began to gather again at the back of his mind and the dull fires of his lust began to glow angrily in his veins.
\n\u201cSomeone you were in love with?\u201d he asked ironically.
\n\u201cIt was a young boy I used to know,\u201d she answered, \u201cnamed Michael Furey. He used to sing that song, The Lass of Aughrim<\/i>. He was very delicate.\u201d
\nGabriel was silent. He did not wish her to think that he was interested in this delicate boy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nThe consolation of Philosophy<\/a> (Boetius)<\/h3>Boetius, who used to be rich and famous, is sent to jail. There, he can only speak to Philosophy, who in a gracious hands give him consolation against the ills of life. Why action is desirable, and why life is about unexpectations.<\/p>O Fortuna!<\/p>\n
The Black Swan<\/a> (Nicholas Nassim Taleb)<\/h3>Deep thoughts about the role of chance. It is really inspiring in that you realize that no one in the world has a clue of what’s happening, or can possibly have.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nWe like stories, we like to summarize, and we like to simplify, i.e., to re\u00ad duce the dimension of matters. The first of the problems of human nature that we examine in this section, the one just illustrated above, is what I call the narrative fallacy. (It is actually a fraud, but, to be more polite, I will call it a fallacy.) The fallacy is associated with our vulnerability to over-interpretation and our predilection for compact stories over raw truths. It severely distorts our mental representation of the world; it is particularly acute when it comes to the rare event.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Thinking Fast and Slow<\/a> (Daniel Kahneman)<\/h3>Few cool thoughts.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nOdean began by studying the trading records of 10,000 brokerage accounts of individual investors spanning a seven-year period. He was able to analyze every transaction the investors executed through that firm, nearly 163,000 trades. This rich set of data allowed Odean to identify all instances in which an investor sold some of his holdings in one stock and soon afterward bought another stock. By these actions the investor revealed that he (most of the investors were men) had a definite idea about the future of the two stocks: he expected the stock that he chose to buy to do better than the stock he chose to sell.<\/p>To determine whether those ideas were well founded, Odean compared the returns of the stock the investor had sold and the stock he had bought in its place, over the course of one year after the transaction. The results were unequivocally bad. On average, the shares that individual traders sold did better than those they bought, by a very substantial margin: 3.2 percentage points per year, above and beyond the significant costs of executing the two trades.<\/p>It is important to remember that this is a statement about averages: some individuals did much better, others did much worse. However, it is clear that for the large majority of individual investors, taking a shower and doing nothing would have been a better policy than implementing the ideas that came to their minds<\/strong>. Later research by Odean and his colleague Brad Barber supported this conclusion. In a paper titled \u2015Trading Is Hazardous to Your health, they showed that, on average, the most active traders had the poorest results, while the investors who traded the least earned the highest returns. In another paper, titled \u2015Boys Will Be Boys,\u2016 they showed that men acted on their useless ideas significantly more often than women, and that as a result women achieved better investment results than men.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe Selfish gene (Richard Dawkins)<\/h3>
In a world of so-called “free-market”, there is ample use of the notion of the “survival of the fittest”, which is often misunderstood for what it’s not — the dominance of the strongest.<\/p>(I particularly loved the chapter on dynamic game theory)<\/p>\n
Walden (Henry David Thoreau)<\/h3>
A must-read to understand the poetry and despair of the American life.<\/p>\n
Children, who play life, discern its true law and relations more clearly than men, who fail to live it worthily, but who think that they are wiser by experience, that is, by failure.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Steppenwolf (Herman Hesse)<\/h3>
My favorite book from early adulthood.<\/p>There are also many other books to read — Bertrand Russell “Religion and Science<\/a>“, Nietzsche’s “Birth of Tragedy<\/a>“, Stefan Zweig’s “The World of Yesterday<\/a>“, Albert Camus “The Myth of Sisyphus<\/a>“, Romain Gary “Promise at dawn” and many others…<\/p>\n
Claim Victory Despite Defeat.<\/strong><\/p>This, which is an impudent trick, is played as follows: When your opponent has answered several of your questions without the answers turning out favourable to the conclusion at which you are aiming, advance the desired conclusion, \u2014 although it does not in the least follow, \u2014 as though it had been proved, and proclaim it in a tone of triumph. If your opponent is shy or stupid, and you yourself possess a great deal of impudence and a good voice, the trick may easily succeed. It is akin to the fallacy non causae ut causae.<\/p><\/blockquote>
(There’s an updated version of these techiques by Tenaillon<\/a>, in French)<\/p>\n
The Edge<\/a> annual questions<\/h3>
I found these books ideal to keep up with the latest news in all fields of science and arts.<\/p>From Hans Ulrich Obrist’s 2013 entry “The Relative Obscurity Of The Writings Of \u00c9douard Glissant<\/a>“<\/span><\/p>\n
Gerhard Richter says that art is the highest form of hope. I would add that art is the primary form of resistance to homogenisation and extinction. To quote Zweig again: ‘art still exists to give shape to multiple ways of being’.<\/p><\/blockquote>
You can find all the questions and responses here<\/a>, and every year a book is edited. This a great thing to read when you’re traveling, because each response is a few pages long, ideal when you cannot focus too much<\/p>2017 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC TERM OR CONCEPT OUGHT TO BE MORE WIDELY KNOWN?
\n2016 : WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER THE MOST INTERESTING RECENT [SCIENTIFIC] NEWS?
\n2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
\n2014 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC IDEA IS READY FOR RETIREMENT?
\n2013 : WHAT *SHOULD* WE BE WORRIED ABOUT?
\n2012 : WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE DEEP, ELEGANT, OR BEAUTIFUL EXPLANATION?
\n2011 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT WOULD IMPROVE EVERYBODY’S COGNITIVE TOOLKIT?
\n2010 : HOW IS THE INTERNET CHANGING THE WAY YOU THINK?
\n2009 : WHAT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING?
\n2008 : WHAT HAVE YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT? WHY?
\n2007 : WHAT ARE YOU OPTIMISTIC ABOUT?
\n2006 : WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA?
\n2005 : WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE EVEN THOUGH YOU CANNOT PROVE IT?<\/p>\nGodel Escher Bach (Douglas Hoffstadter)<\/h3>
Helps you understand what is logic. This is not an easy text, since it requires more than basic notions of mathematics, but it blends together music, painting and logic.<\/p>\n
The Dubliners<\/a> (James Joyce)<\/h3>
This a classic, from probably to most interesting English author of the 20th century.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat about the song? Why does that make you cry?\u201d
\nShe raised her head from her arms and dried her eyes with the back of her hand like a child. A kinder note than he had intended went into his voice.
\n\u201cWhy, Gretta?\u201d he asked.
\n\u201cI am thinking about a person long ago who used to sing that song.\u201d
\n\u201cAnd who was the person long ago?\u201d asked Gabriel, smiling.
\n\u201cIt was a person I used to know in Galway when I was living with my grandmother,\u201d she said.
\nThe smile passed away from Gabriel\u2019s face. A dull anger began to gather again at the back of his mind and the dull fires of his lust began to glow angrily in his veins.
\n\u201cSomeone you were in love with?\u201d he asked ironically.
\n\u201cIt was a young boy I used to know,\u201d she answered, \u201cnamed Michael Furey. He used to sing that song, The Lass of Aughrim<\/i>. He was very delicate.\u201d
\nGabriel was silent. He did not wish her to think that he was interested in this delicate boy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nThe consolation of Philosophy<\/a> (Boetius)<\/h3>
Boetius, who used to be rich and famous, is sent to jail. There, he can only speak to Philosophy, who in a gracious hands give him consolation against the ills of life. Why action is desirable, and why life is about unexpectations.<\/p>O Fortuna!<\/p>\n
The Black Swan<\/a> (Nicholas Nassim Taleb)<\/h3>
Deep thoughts about the role of chance. It is really inspiring in that you realize that no one in the world has a clue of what’s happening, or can possibly have.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nWe like stories, we like to summarize, and we like to simplify, i.e., to re\u00ad duce the dimension of matters. The first of the problems of human nature that we examine in this section, the one just illustrated above, is what I call the narrative fallacy. (It is actually a fraud, but, to be more polite, I will call it a fallacy.) The fallacy is associated with our vulnerability to over-interpretation and our predilection for compact stories over raw truths. It severely distorts our mental representation of the world; it is particularly acute when it comes to the rare event.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Thinking Fast and Slow<\/a> (Daniel Kahneman)<\/h3>
Few cool thoughts.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nOdean began by studying the trading records of 10,000 brokerage accounts of individual investors spanning a seven-year period. He was able to analyze every transaction the investors executed through that firm, nearly 163,000 trades. This rich set of data allowed Odean to identify all instances in which an investor sold some of his holdings in one stock and soon afterward bought another stock. By these actions the investor revealed that he (most of the investors were men) had a definite idea about the future of the two stocks: he expected the stock that he chose to buy to do better than the stock he chose to sell.<\/p>To determine whether those ideas were well founded, Odean compared the returns of the stock the investor had sold and the stock he had bought in its place, over the course of one year after the transaction. The results were unequivocally bad. On average, the shares that individual traders sold did better than those they bought, by a very substantial margin: 3.2 percentage points per year, above and beyond the significant costs of executing the two trades.<\/p>It is important to remember that this is a statement about averages: some individuals did much better, others did much worse. However, it is clear that for the large majority of individual investors, taking a shower and doing nothing would have been a better policy than implementing the ideas that came to their minds<\/strong>. Later research by Odean and his colleague Brad Barber supported this conclusion. In a paper titled \u2015Trading Is Hazardous to Your health, they showed that, on average, the most active traders had the poorest results, while the investors who traded the least earned the highest returns. In another paper, titled \u2015Boys Will Be Boys,\u2016 they showed that men acted on their useless ideas significantly more often than women, and that as a result women achieved better investment results than men.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The Selfish gene (Richard Dawkins)<\/h3>
In a world of so-called “free-market”, there is ample use of the notion of the “survival of the fittest”, which is often misunderstood for what it’s not — the dominance of the strongest.<\/p>(I particularly loved the chapter on dynamic game theory)<\/p>\n
Walden (Henry David Thoreau)<\/h3>
A must-read to understand the poetry and despair of the American life.<\/p>\n
Children, who play life, discern its true law and relations more clearly than men, who fail to live it worthily, but who think that they are wiser by experience, that is, by failure.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Steppenwolf (Herman Hesse)<\/h3>
My favorite book from early adulthood.<\/p>There are also many other books to read — Bertrand Russell “Religion and Science<\/a>“, Nietzsche’s “Birth of Tragedy<\/a>“, Stefan Zweig’s “The World of Yesterday<\/a>“, Albert Camus “The Myth of Sisyphus<\/a>“, Romain Gary “Promise at dawn” and many others…<\/p>\n