Category Archives: epistemology

Faster than light !

No shame !

That’s what Nature said to those Prometheuses who wanted to steal the neutrinos from the realm of light (via).

No shame, because they put themselves at risk, claiming that the centenary rule that nothing can go faster than light might not be so unbreakable, while keeping their calm at all time.

“point 5 past light !”

The best is their allegations re-opened the debate on what the speed of light really is the limit of.

Even though I’m not a specialist in special relativity, I was pleased to hear the crazy theories like this one :

The speed of light is like a barrier. You cannot cross it, but you can be already on the other side, where the neutrinos might be.

Photons are exactly on the wall : they cannot go any slower or faster.

(as heard on the radio).

I liked this picture because it relates to two (mis?)conception that I have.

Continue reading

Bombykol

I recently read the book “Bad Science” by Ben Goldacre (it’s worth buying, but if you are remote, you can still visit the Pirate Bay… There is also some very nice material on this website).
It’s an excellent book, about great scientific scams, such as homeopathy, memory of water, alledged extra-benefits of highly expensive cosmetics and nutrition), and gives a good discussion about Placebo effect. Continue reading

The two cultures

I OCRed the manuscript of the famous “The Two Cultures”  lecture by R.C. Snow.
You can find an html version, or read the original version in a poorly-scanned pdf.

I like this text, because it gives an overview of the consequences of the forced choice you have to make, at some point, between hard (scientific) and soft (humanities) knowledge.
I don’t want to choose. I guess I’m a bit oldschool.

I think that one possible definition of our modern culture is that it is one in which nine-tenths of our intellectuals can’t read any poetry.  – Randall Jarrell

Here’s an extract of “The two cultures” :

The non-scientists have a rooted impression that the scientists are shallowly optimistic, unaware of man’s condition. On the other hand, the scientists believe that the literary intellectuals are totally lacking in foresight, peculiarly unconcerned with their brother men, in a deep sense anti-intellectual, anxious to restrict both art and thought to the existential moment. And so on.

Anyone with a mild talent for invective could produce plenty of this kind of subterranean back-chat. On each side there is some of it which is not entirely baseless. It is all destructive. Much of it rests on misinterpretations which are dangerous. I should like to deal with two of the most profound of these now, one on each side.

Une parabole

English readers : this post is about a French translation of E.W. Dijkstra’s ‘Parable’ (archive EWD594) I’ve made.
You can already enjoy the text in your own language!

J’ai traduit pour vos beaux yeux une parabole que l’on doit au Prof. Edsger W. Dijkstra, légende de la programmation informatique. Elle est tirée de l’archive EWD594.

Vous avez à disposition une version html, si cela vous plaît mieux. Assez parlé, la voici :

Il y a quelques années de cela, une société de chemin de fer fut fondée, et l’un de ses administrateurs — probablement un commercial — découvrit que les investissements initiaux pourraient être réduits de manière significative si seuls cinquante pour cent des voitures étaient équipées de toilettes; il fut donc décidé qu’il en serait de la sorte.

Continue reading

Le plaisir de l’imagination

English readers : I’ve made the transcript of the wonderful “Fun to Imagine” interviews of Feyman.
You should definitely watch it or read it!

J’ai enfin fini la transcription et la traduction des vidéos “Fun to imagine” diffusées sur la BBC en 1983 (et visible sur ton tube).

Vous pouvez voir le résultat ici:
version française (html)

version française (pdf)
version originale

Voici un extrait du transcript traduit: Continue reading